I have no problem with the same company being successful in different competitions. Good for them, if they can beat the competition openly, fairly and transparently, but I would argue that this is not the case that I think we're talking about. It appears to me that they did that on the F-35, but as we get to talk about the Canadian surface combatants, we might have a vigorous discussion or debate over that. I would argue that, in that case, the government abdicated its accountability for the program, off-loaded it to the private sector and let the private sector choose the companies with which it wanted to work.
Frankly, in this particular case, I don't think anybody in this room or anybody in the industry was shocked and surprised to see Irving pick Lockheed Martin. They were doing business with them for many years. They had a good relationship, and frankly, if I were in charge, I probably would have done the same thing. However, from my perspective, that is a totally different case about how Lockheed Martin got to be chosen. Others might differ on that.
In principle, every competition is separate, and I have no trouble with a good company winning more than its share.