Thank you.
Just to the witnesses, I do want to say I think it's pretty disingenuous to project cost savings based on a comparison of purchase price in one case with asking price in another. That's clearly an apples-to-orange comparison, or maybe more precisely an apples-to-magic apples comparison.
You've set an asking price for the old property at 550 Park Avenue, but that asking price is not the same as the appraised value. We heard that yesterday.
My research team looked at other properties being sold at 550 Park Avenue. All of them have sold substantially below asking price, if they were sold at all. In many cases, the price was reduced and then they were taken off the market and not sold. Just for your reference, we looked at units number 10, 2W, 17E, 11W, 12A, 16A, 16E and 6W. In all cases they were reduced in price and not sold or they sold at a price substantially reduced from the asking price, so your fake math of comparing the asking price to the purchase price is pretty thin.
If you wanted to show that this was a good transaction and that there were savings, I'd like to know why in the world you didn't just sell the existing property first before purchasing the new property. That would have given you a sense of what your actual comparison was in terms of numbers. Why did you wait to even list the old property until you purchased the new one?