Let me just ask you something quickly. I appreciate what you're saying, but this actually does precede COVID. I still have ATIPs from the 42nd Parliament that are outstanding, going on five and a half years.
In your departmental plan, there was legislation. It's not a suggestion to maybe do it if you can. The 30 days' response to ATIPs is legislation. Your own departmental plan is to only achieve 90% of 90%. Basically, 81% of ATIPs will be handled properly under the required legislation.
Do you think it's acceptable to actually put in writing that your goal is to violate the legislation 19% of the time? Should we not go for 100% and recognize...? Last year, 49% was achieved. Should we not be recognizing that this is legislation and saying that we will follow the law?