Thank you very much to the chair.
I thank the witnesses for being here with us today.
I think this is a hard conversation. When you have so many Canadians across the country really struggling to afford basic necessities and you know how hard it is when you're thinking about if you can keep your house or you are going to have to sell it, and you actually have to pay more in rent than you do for your mortgage, it's hard to hear about big spending. I want to recognize that.
I also have a hard time listening to the Conservatives when I know back in October 2010, their investment in properties and diplomatic residences rose by 430%. It's a bit frustrating on both sides for me to listen to this when I know how hard it is for Canadians right now.
I do see the value in diplomacy. I do see the value, of course, in these opportunities, although I would love to see us do a little bit more work connecting rural and remote communities to some of these opportunities. I hope that you will continue to expand your knowledge and understanding of how to do that.
I do have a few questions, through the chair, for you, Minister.
I heard your response multiple times saying it wasn't a political decision, and I understand that as a person who understands the basic roles of operations versus the political influence in this place. However, there is a lot of concern that there was political interference. I'm wondering if you could please explain to the committee if there is a price threshold for property purchases within Global Affairs Canada. Are there limits? Through the chair, how are you as minister, and in your role, included? When are you talked to about it? Again, you said that you learned about it when you opened the news, and that seems a little concerning to me, so I'm wondering how that works.
I understand that you've delegated the role to staff. I understand that it's operational. However, how are you included to make sure that there's some wisdom in the political realm?