Evidence of meeting #49 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was know.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Dominic Barton  As an Individual

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I'm afraid that is your time, Mrs. Block. Perhaps you can follow up on the next round.

We have Mr. Housefather for five minutes.

Colleagues, we started a couple of minutes late, but we've gone through very fast, so we're going to have a tiny bit of time left over. After Mr. Housefather, we'll do three minutes for the Conservatives, back to three minutes for the Liberals, one minute for the Bloc and one minute for Mr. Johns to bat cleanup.

Thanks.

Go ahead, Mr. Housefather, please, for five minutes.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Barton, thank you for your patience today. Do you know what a corporate witness is?

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

It would be a witness in a litigation who testifies on behalf of the corporation, and they would be extensively prepared by the corporation's general counsel and outside counsel to come testify on behalf of the corporation. Are you a corporate witness here today?

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

I am not. I'm a private citizen.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

You're an individual who no longer is related to this company, who no longer has shares in the company, who no longer works for the company, who doesn't have access to the records of the company, who hasn't been prepared by employees of the company to go back and look at all the different things that might come up. Is that correct?

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

That's right.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

You're relying simply on your unaided memory of things that happened years ago.

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

I think—just to diagnose what's happened—the goal for some was to bring you here and to find out that you were a close personal friend of the Prime Minister and that the two of you had talked about giving contracts from the Government of Canada to McKinsey. When that didn't pan out, then we started turning to attacking you and attacking McKinsey.

Now, it might be that McKinsey does a lot of things that are inappropriate. That's neither here nor there; we'll get to it with the actual witnesses from McKinsey. For example, one of the witnesses I'd like to hear from is the chief compliance officer of McKinsey. Would you agree that would be an appropriate person—

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

Yes, absolutely.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

—who would talk to us about whether McKinsey was or was not respecting the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other acts across the world that would be of interest to this committee?

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

Including maybe the good question asked about the FDA and working with Purdue—ask them.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

Exactly. They would also be able to tell us what corrective actions the company has taken in order to prevent that from happening again. They would be the right person. Is that correct?

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

Absolutely.

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

It's not you?

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

Okay.

With respect to a lot of the questions you've been asked, I want to ask, having come from the corporate world myself and having been the general counsel and chief administrative officer of a company that wasn't anywhere near as large as McKinsey—we were probably about one-tenth to one-fifteenth the size—how many overall contracts and how many overall clients did McKinsey have in a $10-billion company?

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

I don't think.... Just take the $10 billion and divide.... I mean, it's tens of thousands.

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

It would be 10,000 customers.

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

Yes, it'd be a minimum of 10,000. I mean, there are 3,000 client engagements going on every day.

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

Could anybody in the company, no matter who, be aware of all of these different clients and what was happening?

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

No. In fact, the way it's organized is that there are practices, as I mentioned before; there are sectors. The pharma practice is accountable and responsible for what it's doing. The banking practice.... No one in the pharma practice knows what's going on in the banking practice; they're not interested. There are sectors that are set up. There are functions. That's how a partnership works. That's where, again, the general counsel, the protocols that are in place to make sure people are following that, is very important.

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

That would normally fall under the compliance officer and the general counsel, not directly under the managing partner.

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Dominic Barton

That's right.