I respectfully disagree with my colleague Mr. Johns, clearly because that's the reason why I want to bring this forward.
This amendment—and actually there are going to be a number of them—is going to prevent any overlaps with other recourse mechanisms for reprisal, because if we don't do that, then what we're going to have is multiple processes being conducted on the same issues by different administrative bodies, with differing mandates and objectives. That would be a waste of resources, one, and I think the greatest concern is that it could come out with inconsistent determinations that would be offering different remedies. I think that's the principal reason why there is this change.