I previously told this committee how much I value the procurement strategy for indigenous business—I think we all should—and how critical it is to have indigenous leadership and involvement in procurement. It's something New Democrats have been fighting hard for, especially in procurement opportunities that directly affect indigenous communities.
I want to make sure of what's happening with these set-asides, but from what I've heard, it doesn't seem like it is how it's supposed to be. PSPC's roles for the program are, rightly, set up to make sure that work doesn't simply get subcontracted to non-indigenous entities, but when I asked Dalian about how they subcontract indigenous set-aside contracts, I was appalled by their answers. They did not acknowledge the requirements for subcontractors to be indigenous.
In fact, Mr. Yeo said the rules allow them to “hire pretty much whoever we want”. He also told us that the indigenous set-aside requirements are audited on every joint venture Dalian and Coradix do. Is it true that this is being audited on every joint venture they do? Is it true that Indigenous Services Canada has audited the Botler work in particular, as Mr. Yeo claimed?