Going back to the standard practices, we've heard about standard practices, and I find them outrageous when it comes to the procurement here. PSPC admitted that there's literally no limit on what the commission's contractors can pocket on government contracts. If we have a project like Botler's software, where the contractor takes 15% or 20% and the subcontractor takes another 15% to 30%, then the people doing the work get what's left. Let's say $100,000 of federal government money is spent on a project like that. It could end up being only $56,000 that goes to the project work.
The government could get the exact same thing for half as much based on that. There are contracts with even more layers and deeper commissions than that, as you know. The government is admitting that it doesn't know how deep these commissions go.
The Treasury Board Secretariat is mandated to make policy recommendations to protect tax dollars. As a CTO, you do everything you can to stop this runaway gravy train by imposing a limit on commissions. Why hasn't the government hired its own IT recruiters? By the numbers we're seeing, you could hire 10 IT recruiters at the Governor General's salary, based on what GC Strategies got, and still save millions of dollars a year.