Yes, it's on the amendment. I have a lot more to say, obviously, on the general motion. However, on this amendment, we already have paragraph (f), which states that we will supply the documents to the clerk within the period of time that I think is being suggested—and we may amend that as well—“and without redaction”. That's how it's being presented at this point.
By deleting paragraphs (g) and (h), we're also being sensitive to some of the confidentiality matters of the documents. The members will have the opportunity to review them more in depth—and I think that's appropriate—without compromising the situation and the competitiveness of what foreign direct investment requires.
I find it rather surprising that the members continue to ask this to be provided, when we already have other committees requesting the same documents going forward. I, therefore, reinforce the issue that it is being asked that the documents be presented, which we'll be obliging, and that's that.