In a way, that's the balance we're trying to strike. When we talk to Stellantis, we want to make sure that they are as open as possible with Parliament, since accountability is important. At the same time, we want to protect what needs to be protected.
We haven't discussed with Stellantis the possibility of the committee having access to the entire contract. We could ask them if a Stellantis representative joins the meeting; we could also do so at another time if it isn't possible today. We are seeking to strike a balance; we are not trying to hide anything, but we understand that access to certain elements of the contract is necessary if we are to do our job. We respect that.
We need to ensure accountability for the investments that are made. This information really allows us to exercise due diligence for each contract.
However, I agree that it is sometimes necessary for confidential elements of the contract to be sent to Parliament and its committees so that the documents can be reviewed.
