You would have nothing to do with ensuring that there were job guarantees. Whose job would it be to ensure there were job guarantees?
From what I understand, the Treasury Board has to make sure spending is justified, risks are understood, the department has done its homework and taxpayers are getting what they pay for.
Whose job is it to make sure there are job guarantees or clawbacks if things don't happen, or, like in the case of Stellantis, they leave?