The general way it functions is really within the confidentiality clauses of the agreements, which are typically that we need to have consent from third parties to release information into either the public domain or a parliamentary committee. That process typically involves a back-and-forth discussion with the companies and the government about what's being requested by the committee, in this case, and what could be released.
The role of the government in this case is trying to ensure that we are as open as possible about what we release and as transparent as possible with the committees while also protecting commercially confidential information, which is important for the companies that shared it with us in trust.
There are occasions when companies will offer redactions. In this case, which I've clarified in my comments, we've had a long-standing relationship with Stellantis. We have an understanding of the types of information they feel should be redacted for commercial confidentiality reasons.
In this case, what we did for expediency's sake is highlight for Stellantis the areas we thought they wished they had redacted. Stellantis, at any point, could have changed their minds and offered to have further redactions or they could have asked for fewer redactions, but they essentially consented to the redactions that were highlighted for their consideration through that process.