I also note an interesting parallel between the way the government has communicated the $1 trillion, along with a whole chapter in the budget on the superdeduction that they say will have a monumental impact on encouraging investments in this country. If you look at the table that they provide about the cost of the superdeduction, almost all of the superdeduction is already in place today. The only new measure in the budget is about maybe $300 million a year in what I'll call stimulus.
There seems to be consistent messaging from the government saying that they're delivering this big number, but the net benefit of what they're delivering isn't as big as the headline.
Is that fair? You don't have to comment on whether you agree with it or not.
They come out with a big headline, but when you dig down, most of its measures were already happening anyway.