Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm glad to see that you're open to our suggestions, Minister. It reminds me of a Quebec song that says something about feedback going down better if you buy the first round.
I want to cycle back to another grey area in connection to criteria for regulatory sandboxes. We've heard that the main criteria was that it has to be in the public interest. We asked for the definition of public interest, because that can be a qualitative judgment. However, there is no definition.
That could be cause for concern from a monitoring and independence standpoint, because, as we know, the minister may decide on the creation and content of a regulatory sandbox on their own, and this could drag out for three years.
What can we do now so that in three years' time, we don't end up saying that we should have done things differently? Where do things stand with the guardrail?