Evidence of meeting #35 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was report.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Jeglic  Procurement Ombud, Office of the Procurement Ombud
Kilrea  Senior Risk Advisor, Office of the Procurement Ombud

12:20 p.m.

Procurement Ombud, Office of the Procurement Ombud

Alexander Jeglic

On implementation, the clear answer is ISC, so asking questions about implementation is—

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Would there be any value in having a meeting between now and your report in six months with ISC and PSPC on where they are after three months, or it is best to wait until your interim report comes out?

12:20 p.m.

Procurement Ombud, Office of the Procurement Ombud

Alexander Jeglic

I think you have to allow them time, because if you call them too soon, again, unfortunately, you're not going to hear—

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

It's been 30 years.

12:20 p.m.

Procurement Ombud, Office of the Procurement Ombud

Alexander Jeglic

Right, but—

Iqra Khalid Liberal Mississauga—Erin Mills, ON

[Inaudible—Editor]

12:20 p.m.

Procurement Ombud, Office of the Procurement Ombud

Alexander Jeglic

To be fair to the departments in this circumstance, I would suggest that you hold them accountable to what they said they would do in the report. Each department has taken a variety of accountability, but ISC is the leader.

ISC, I would say, is the party you want before the committee to speak to some of the responses to the recommendations.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Thank you very much. Again, I appreciate the report. I appreciate your openness today and the time you've spent with us. It's been a fantastic meeting. Thanks very much.

Colleagues, unless there's something else, we are adjourned.

Thank you very much, everyone.