Thank you.
Mr. Hammond, your department is pretty important. Public Services and Procurement Canada is kind of like the engine room of the government. It buys goods for departments, manages federal buildings and major assets, runs pay and pension systems for public servants, and does a lot more.
Looking at your performance numbers, I see that you're missing the mark on a number of things. The simplest way that I can think of to explain this is that you're like a general contractor hired to run an entire home—not just one job but everything: the renovations, the bills, the maintenance, and even making sure that everyone in the household gets paid properly. Right now, that contractor is already missing deadlines, going over budget and not always delivering what was promised. In fact, by your own numbers, only about 6.5 out of 10 projects are being awarded on time, for example.
Someone with a contractor who gets only two out of three jobs done on time wouldn't automatically think that the best way to get better results is to lay people off.
If you can cut hundreds of millions of dollars without reducing service, why were these efficiencies not implemented earlier?