It's a really good question. I'd say that there's an onus on us as an organization, and there's an onus on parliamentarians.
Today's report has about 2500 words in it, in either official language. The onus on us, as an organization, is to ensure that the words are very carefully chosen to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, they can't easily be taken out of context.
Another change we're making in the office—and you see part of it today, as we are joined by colleagues and technical experts—is trying to reinforce the technical grounding and the numbers in the presentation to the committee, so trying to take away some of the words and inject some more facts and numbers.
The last change we're making on our side, as some parliamentarians may be aware, is that, for the first time ever, we introduced a media blackout in the office when the report was released at 9:00 this morning—and that was very deliberate. Because of the invitation from the government operations committee, we wanted to try something very different. We released the report; we then had many meetings with parliamentarians to provide briefings and background on the report; and our first on-the-record testimony was here. The hope was that our words would be going to you first, so parliamentarians would have a very clear sense of what we're saying and how we're presenting the work.
In terms of the next step of having parliamentarians, potentially, represent the work in a more balanced way, I don't have a good answer for that. However, if you figure it out, let me know, and I'll be happy to help you implement it.