Yes, I do agree that we need to do more beyond just the policy itself. As I mentioned during the last round of questions, this is more of a passive, middle- to long-term strategy. In my view it's still entirely justifiable—and necessary, given the moment—but if you're not providing supports to industry now, then it's difficult for them to benefit in the middle to long term.
Is this independently an industrial strategy? In my view it isn't. I think there are strategic components to it, especially around the sourcing policy, in which there's a clear philosophy: We're thinking about steel, aluminum and wood. There is clearly an ideology and clearly an aim here, whereas in the other components of the policy, there are also aims but, again, they're more passive.
As I mentioned before, I want to see this done in concert with other measures. That's not to say that buy Canadian, in and of itself, is an unworthy idea or that this policy is unworthy, but it can't function if we aren't investing more in industry.