We have seen some push-back internationally, not just from the United States. I will say that in my view, some of that is a tad hypocritical given the experimentation that's going on with some of those jurisdictions. In the United States, of course, it's going back to the 1930s.
The point taken, though, is that this policy purposely works and discriminates against suppliers based upon their origin and also introduces offsets, which are generally prohibited in international trade agreements and even domestic trade agreements.
Here we are explicitly trying to navigate those agreements by using the national security exception that's generally included for just about any agreement. The language sometimes varies. We're saying that the strategic procurements of these sectors are so fundamental to our national sovereignty that they are reasonably justified as an exemption. The United Kingdom is doing something very similar, so I think we're on solid ground here. It is plausible that an international partner may protest this in some way or raise a dispute. I think it's unlikely, but that is the risk of going for high-value contracts instead of the low-value contracts that you see in Ontario.