I think it's difficult to portray all possible actions that a government might take. For that reason, we wanted to have a baseline so that people could understand what's in and what's out, and from there, reasonable people can take their own perspectives about what the government may do moving forward in terms of things like the renewal of the Canada health transfer, which is currently on a track to moving to much lower growth for provinces and territories per current legislation.
People may differ on whether the government will move to take that back up to the traditional 5% to 6% range. That's not in our forecast. It's not in our medium-term track. We wanted to be clear and transparent so that as people look at these types of measures moving forward, they can say, “Okay, that's not in, but we anticipate that would be a reasonable thing to do.” Then if the government does that, you know, and you can do calculations of where that takes us in terms of debt to GDP and so on.
That was the underlying logic.