I understand. However, a subamendment cannot completely replace an amendment by proposing to do the exact opposite of the amendment. The proposed subamendment to Ms. Gaudreau's amendment is not in order because it would completely change it by getting rid of it.
I just want to make sure everyone understands that because we're ready to proceed. Mr. Chair, to make things easier, we could all give unanimous consent for Ms. Gaudreau to withdraw her amendment. Then we can talk about Mr. Genuis's amendment, which is complete. Then we can consider Ms. Sudds' proposal that the meeting be held in camera. It would be easier to do it in that order rather than amend something that isn't the committee's original intent.