We're on Mr. Genuis's subamendment that has come out: “and that the departments and agencies tasked with the document production suggest redactions in writing along with the unredacted documents; and that the committee review the suggested redactions in conjunction with the parliamentary law clerk”.
It goes to the original amendment offered by the Liberals, which is to have it redacted. I've seen this before, where the officials will say, “This is what we'd like to redact and why”, and that's presented to us. We don't get it redacted; we get “This is what we want redacted.” That's what Mr. Genuis suggested to add to your amendment. He was agreeing with you, but he added that the redactions be reviewed with us. It's not specified, but we can add that after the fact, I assume.
Are we clear on that, Ms. Gaudreau?