Thank you.
I did read some of the evidence of the last hearings, around the athletes, and I think a couple of things. It goes back to one of my first points. With the coaches, it's through education. Coaches face ethical decisions all the time, which can impact these things.
Through education on the prevention of concussions, it's important to outline that the right thing from an ethical perspective is that when you suspect a concussion, it's time for that athlete to be pulled from the field of play. We have to continue to do that as a system, at all levels. That comes from a governmental perspective and also from the sport organizations—national, provincial, local and community-based. To me, that's the first point.
The second is that we don't really get involved with the tracking of concussions, but I know we do sit on the federal, provincial and territorial working group on this, and there has been a lot of chat and recommendations that this is an important thing to start tracking more often, especially when you see interventions like education, and how that's actually impacting, hopefully, a reduction in concussions.
I can't really talk.... My sports are low risk from a concussion perspective, but again, we do face it as coaches all the time, in that players can come to practice with that. Personally, as a coach, I don't take any risks with that. I was a hockey trainer as well, and I never once took a risk around that.
That's my big message. It's around continuing to make coaches comfortable in those ethical decisions, and making sure that they think ethically in how they are working with their athletes, and what they do as soon as they suspect a concussion.