I'll start, and I'll ask Janet Pronk to continue.
We actually have those lists. Those lists were requested. We actually generated those lists. They're part of what's gone to the department to come to this committee, and they are en route.
Specifically, you asked how the nature of the consultations influenced where it is that this food guide is going. I would say profoundly.
What we did in November was come out with a platform. It was the best we could do at the time. What we heard back was, “Sorry, it's not good enough.” So what we've done is take the nature of, “Sorry, it's not good enough,” and we have taken the next steps.
As an example, we had significant input around the issue of salt and sodium. A lot of people said that they thought we had missed it. We hadn't spent nearly enough time or enough energy ensuring that Canadians understand when they're choosing these foods that sodium or salt is an important issue.
Absolutely, that comment was correct. We've gone back, and we've engaged in making sure that when we come out we address that kind of issue.