As I said, the standardization and the ability to monitor is a benefit. As well, there is the ability to create a culture of consent. It may sound trite, but I think it's important. It is going to create an awareness that there are specific consent rules in place.
Because it's going to have that impact, I think it's very important to ensure--and again, this is important work that a body like this could do--that the rationales for that regime are clearly articulated. I think they need to be consistent to some degree with long-held research ethics and norms that apply to other areas of research.