Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have one question, and I know it refers a little bit to the Heart and Stroke Foundation. We've done some work with, or at least had the opportunity to listen to and have interaction with, the folks from the U.K. who talked about their food labelling program and how successful that has been in its use of colours for identification.
I'm just remembering a story that I told Ms. Priddy about reading labels. I mentioned that one weekend that's what I did every time I went to get something to eat: I read the label. Ms. Demers said she felt sorry for me because that weekend was obviously a very boring one for me, but it was somewhat informative.
In any event, I saw one of the benefits of the U.K. system being the ability for people to see that image, that colour, right away and then to deal with it and say, well, it's red, it's green, it's amber, or whatever the three colours may be.
We also heard about a sort of check mark system. We talked a little bit about whether there could be an integration of the two. Quite frankly, though, shouldn't there be some prudence or some smart thinking on our behalf, from a federal perspective, that we should go with what's working versus trying to implement a system that will take some time for people to understand? From everything we've heard, the system seems to be working very well in the U.K.