What you're telling me, then, is that the Canadian Parliament chose to go further at that time than the International Health Regulations of the day. It chose to go one step further in terms of public safety and include land conveyances, something that no other jurisdiction in the world does, if I heard Mr. Malo's question. Yet the Canadian Parliament chose to go further.
Did everyone just miss this? The House of Commons missed it. The Senate missed it. There was just a screw-up in the language. That's the intent of my question. Was that the clear intention of the bill or not? Gentlemen?