Exactly. Something that should be tracked is exactly how highly priced the help was for each task and whether they were able to sufficiently accomplish it.
There's another thing that I was wondering about. With the incentive of $20 million, it was probably fairly easy to recruit these surgeons. They would know that they'd have all this support and this goal. Any kind of project often gets better results because people are motivated.
Has anybody tracked the impact on the salaries of those participating surgeons? In other words, were they able to perform more surgeries because some of the preliminary work had been done by somebody else and their salaries therefore went up? Did it go down because they were so involved with the patients or something?