I do not think it's appropriate. In fact, I want meaningful information. I absolutely want to be able to make the right choice about the right product. I don't disagree, but I don't agree with a list-based approach that would label substances on the IARC list that have been assessed in a particular context as such when they can be properly formulated into a product to prevent cancer.
I just don't think that's meaningful to consumers. I don't think that we should, as Dr. Schwarcz said, cry wolf and put the label on everything. Then it becomes meaningless. We want precautionary labelling that's currently on our products to be meaningful--