It was only to add that I think TRIUMF is an excellent institution, and we have a lot of confidence in their ability as a group to develop alternatives. I can't comment on the photofission method itself, but I do think that is a long-term solution that we should definitely be investigating and considering investment in. I absolutely agree with the comments about PET, and that making PET more widely available in Canada will only serve to help our patients.
You asked about alternatives. We heard about the sodium fluoride. If I could come back to a comment made by I think Madam McLeod on the ability to monitor and evaluate--which should also come with this issue with TRIUMF turning on and off--we need a better way to actually look at who is using what. Doing a survey from the Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine is one way to do it, but really I think that one thing the government can do is look at better ways of monitoring the use of the tracers than the ones we've had. I don't know for sure, but does Health Canada have resources to do this? Are there resources available now that could use more sophisticated means to monitor this and look at the distribution, and really look at access for all Canadians?