I'll read as far as I can and then I'll stop.
The board practises excessive unnecessary secrecy, which undermines public trust. At the second board meeting, board members were asked to approve the minutes from the first meeting. The first minutes were thin. There was almost no difference between the agenda for the meeting and the minutes of the meeting. When a board member requested that more details be included in the minutes, there was resistance to this idea from the president, supported by some board members, on the grounds that it would be risky for the organization to include too much detail.
Second, despite a decision made in March 2007 that board minutes would be publicly available, they have never been publicly available.
On inclusiveness, let me say that for reasons that are unclear, the president worked to build strategic alliances with the providers of technologies and not the users of technologies. This was done over the objections of board members.