The Gates Foundation came out in July of 2009. It started with a disclaimer. It talked about what evidence it didn't look at. It looked only at capacity rather than quality.
Dr. Gerson was part of the original process, and he gave a critique of that study. It seems that part of the government's decision is based on one study with which there were certainly challenges. If Dr. Gerson was trusted enough to be part of the initial process, why are his comments not being taken into account?