That would come out of our operating budget. It would be an identified need the organization has, and then we would go through a competitive process to identify a vendor. One of the challenges we face with information technology adoption is the funding. It typically has not been something that has formed part of the budgets, and I think that's something that needs to change. There needs to be an expectation that organizations commit a certain percentage of their budget to information adoption so that we can get to the same playing field.
There was a comment made earlier about research. You have some organizations that do an awful lot of research and are able to introduce the latest practices and technology, and you have some that can't do any of it. I think we need to get everybody at least to a basic level of information adoption. Part of that requires a shift in the funding philosophy we have. That's going to require us to shift funds from other aspects of the organization to information technology.
In the case of PatientKeeper, we knew it would improve outcomes because physicians would be more engaged electronically and would have faster access to information. It costs $250,000 to implement, but then you see savings down the road with respect to length of stay, ordering practices, and things like that.