As my colleague had indicated, the consultation on the act itself did not invoke any really strong reactions from any of the different stakeholders. I think for the most part, our stakeholders thought the act was relatively modern. I think they understood that some key provisions were in there. In terms of protecting environment and health, those were very solid. In terms of the openness and transparency, for example, before we make any big regulatory decision we do have to consult with the public on what's the basis for that decision, what was the science that we received so that we're proposing to approve this pest control product.
I think, writ large, the answer is that most stakeholders are satisfied with the administration of the act as it stands today, and we're not proposing any significant changes to it. Certainly when we looked at our analysis there are a few administrative places where you could say, “well, you know, maybe it would be better if this was clearer, or if that was clearer”, but we also arrived at a conclusion that some of the things people were asking for we could deal with through policy changes rather than legislative changes.