Sure.
The canola growers are one of the organizations that do manage what's called the GROU process, the grower own use process, and we're actively involved in setting up the system now for how we manage data protection and other things like that for the generic registration.
What we've said all along in the consultations—and PMRA has done a good job of consulting with both the CropLife companies and the generic companies in the last year or so to improve how that process works—is that what we really need is both innovation and research. We really depend on that. We want to make sure that there is a balance there. We also need to ensure that generic companies have access to the information they need to produce generic products.
Right now, we feel that the system works pretty well. We do know that our growers do have access to generic products for growing canola. We haven't had a big upswell of growers saying that they do not have access. They seem to be satisfied with the level of access that they have right now. Of course, we are always careful to ensure that this balance continues. PMRA has made some improvements this year and is improving the process, as I understand it, for how that works, especially on the data protection side. Our growers are pretty satisfied with the system right now and the balance in the system. I would say that the PMRA has done a good job.