But on the statistics.... The Ontario Beekeepers' Association is calling for a moratorium on the use of neonics, and the Province of Ontario has a big website dedicated to the health of pollinators and human health. They look at all the statistics, and they've come to the conclusion that there should be a major restriction on the use, etc.
I don't want to look at the particular issue of the bees, whether they are dying or not, or this issue between statistics. But for the claim that this is a science-based process, it doesn't seem very predictable, because the confidence, I think, comes out of predictability. Yet jurisdictions around the world.... The European Union has looked at the statistics, and the same science.
Mr. Kurbis, you mentioned about having the same data packages and hoping that the tolerance levels looked like they came out of the same galaxy. This seems to be an issue here. Everybody is looking at the same science, but the outcome, the regulatory response, isn't very predictable. That's my point.
What's responsible for that?