My next question builds on what Dr. Lunney has been asking about on the neonicotinoids, and of course, Mr. Young and others have raised this as well.
I'm going to focus though on the legislation, which is after all what we're trying to review here. There are so many pesticides that are conditionally registered and they come back to the well over and over again. Sometimes, I'm told, in the context of the neonicotinoids—maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong—that the registration stays conditional even though chronic toxicity studies are still outstanding. They say, okay, we're going to let you register it for another year, but you better get that study in, and that goes on and on. Sometimes it's years until that's done. Is the legislation deficient in allowing this lagging failure to really bite the bullet, allowing us to conditionally register pesticides that often don't have the full data package before them?
I guess I'd ask Mr. Petelle that question first, and then invite anyone else to comment.