My understanding.... I mean, this is now an active ingredient-specific case, which we typically wouldn't get into a discussion on. My understanding in that particular example is that the conditions have actually been satisfied over that decade. They're not the same conditions that were in place a decade ago. What's happened is that the PMRA asked for a set of data, those were provided, and they're being assessed or they were assessed. In the meantime, they've asked for additional conditions as part of that registration, so they've kept it on a conditional registration status.
On February 3rd, 2015. See this statement in context.