Absolutely, and if you look at the requirements for insecticides moving forward, you see that it's going to be much more time-consuming and costly to get those products registered because of the additional data requirements that will now become more standard.
It goes back to my precautions discussion. If you take precautions to the extreme, you can always ask for more and more data, never actually register the product, and never actually have the tools for farmers to use. That's the ultimate use of that precautionary language, which is why I mentioned it in my opening remarks. What the system under the current act gives the PMRA and the minister is the ability to call in data any time they want, and it also forces them to look at any data generated by anybody anywhere in the world and take it into account in their decision-making process.
The last component is that the products have to be re-evaluated on a 15-year cycle, so you don't get products that are registered for 20, 30, or 40 years with the same data. Every 15 years at the maximum, the PMRA will look at all the data, including any new data that have been generated in that 15-year period, and make a new decision on that product. It's a very robust system.