The other concern you've raised in your testimony today relates to conditional registration. I think you indicated that there are some products that have been conditionally registered for 10 years, if I'm understanding you, and yet they still have outstanding scientific reports, toxicity reports. We heard this in the context of neonics two days ago. Surely that's a problem with the statute, not merely the administration of the statute, if you're allowed to have conditional registrations go on and on and on, where key data is simply not available.
Am I understanding what it is you think the act needs to be amended to reflect?