Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thanks to the witnesses.
I think I'm the only one who was here for the original report that we did, and I haven't been on the health committee since. I'm glad to see that even though Parliament dissolved, there was some process that continued.
I would like to ask that we ensure that the review of Safety Code 6 by the Royal Society be tabled as part of our study. I think it was a really critical piece of what we asked out of the last committee. If it has not been tabled already, we can perhaps incorporate it as part of this review.
There are a few areas. Obviously, at this point in time, you talked about what was a very robust process in terms of the research that you included and didn't include. I keep going back. I remember, for example, when—perhaps it was a couple of years ago—Dr. Zamboni's procedure for MS provided hope for patients and there was some research that indicated it might be helpful. But when we actually put in a proper process for evaluating the research, unfortunately it sounds as though to this day it is not something that is actually effective.
Having said that, this research is going to continue to emerge and evolve. Is the World Health Organization doing a massive review right now? Is that accurate?