I think it is an important discussion and I think it's important to understand what those criteria actually mean. The criteria basically are things that increase the risk. They don't necessarily prohibit donation. That is an important difference. As I said to Mr. Webber, those pieces of information will say that this individual is in a situation we recognize as having higher risk, and as I say, it could be even something as serious as intravenous drug abuse.
We still have the opportunity to go in—we can do it very effectively—and do what's called nucleic acid testing. This can tell us in fact within a period of several days whether someone has been exposed to hepatitis C or HIV or different agents like that. The donation physicians and the transplant physicians can discuss that information with the potential recipient, who basically has an opportunity to go forward.
Only, for example, if someone was actually tested and found to be HIV positive would it mean, in the vast majority of centres, that we would not go forward.