That's a big question.
I will humbly say that in the past, the chronic disease prevention framework that was developed with the first nations—now the Inuit have their own, really, and copies of that could be provided to the committee—essentially was a program-by-program approach in communities and health care systems. People would get lost if they weren't caught by one program or another, so this is about creating a continuum of services along a lifespan, with culture as the foundation. Indigenous people certainly share that aspect of it.
It's also about looking at that connection to the social determinants of health. For instance, if a mom is pregnant and gets a prenatal visit, there is also education provided to her about healthy living for herself; planning for the family to have healthy nutrition; preparing for baby to come; continuing that follow-up when baby comes; and, making sure she's attending public health sessions with respect to healthy living and doing it within that context. Then, when her child goes to an aboriginal head start program, there's nutrition education in the program, so that when they're at the preschool level, kids are informed about what types of healthy foods are available to them and how they should seek out the connection to oral health. There's a connection between nutrition and oral health as well; we have the children's oral health initiative.
Really, it's not so much a diabetes strategy. People have moved away from one disease-specific or illness-specific western medical model of strategy development and more into this holistic framework approach. We have one for mental wellness. It's the same concept with chronic disease.