I'm a guest of the committee. The testimony we have heard so far has been excellent and I've learned a lot just hearing from the jurisdictions that are present.
Clearly there are questions on the table that aren't within their jurisdictions, but which the committee seems to want to get answered.
This committee isn't a judge and jury over the prosecution of doctors. We're trying to get some witnesses to the table.
We could have a timeline to get a witness list to the analysts if the motion is to continue the study until we are able to get some of the questions answered. That's a whole different spirit of things. We could think about witnesses and give a list to the analysts, the way we do at any other committee. The analysts could work with the House of Commons to see what is legally appropriate for the committee to be asking or studying in terms of a witness list. Getting a witness list to the analysts in a period of time so they can call further witnesses to continue the study to get to the questions...but I don't think we need to go as far as to specify the witnesses at this moment.