First of all, the way in which they measured or made the statement about research and development funding is on a very historical basis, going back to 1986 on the definition of what would be considered research and development costs. The evolution of drug development has changed dramatically. Back in the day, 30 years ago, a lot of that was really related to bricks-and-mortar equipment and technology. Now, it is heavily financed on clinical trials. In Canada, for example, we have over 9,000 clinical trials going on in Canada at any given time. If they are part of a multinational trial and that trial originates outside of Canada, none of those dollars are counted toward research and development in Canada. That grossly understates the spending.
Sorry, what was the second part of your question?