I'll make one short comment, Dr. Eyolfson, and then Dr. Devine can add to it.
The intent of the work we're going to do in January is really to examine two principal policy directions. Are we simply seeking to further shorten the time period but to keep it as an MSM policy? Or are we going to take a completely different approach, as both we and the Canadian AIDS Society have said, and embark on a policy that does not discriminate on the basis of gender or sexual orientation? We really need to understand that, because just an incremental shortening of the policy doesn't deal with the principal assertion of unfairness and discrimination.
It is possible that what you've mentioned would be one approach. I'm not necessarily sure that it's the ideal or the optimal one, but we need to gather the evidence and the research as to whether there is a different policy approach that we could take altogether, one that would not be simply an incremental shortening of the time period but keeping MSM as the target group. That's the analysis and the research questions that we're going to embark on and seek to answer before we can make the next policy change.