Thank you for that.
There seems to be tension here between the witnesses. We have the issues of operational competence and securing indigenous communities' water supply versus setting, reviewing, and improving overall standards. I used to work in hospitals. Unfortunately, there would be times when a nurse or a doctor would not practice at the professional standards currently before them, or even a hospital itself might have systemic failures and fail to meet the standards as a hospital, but that would not stop the professional bodies or the hospital groupings from pushing for continual review of clinical standards in moving forward. Personally, I don't see these as competing agendas. They're complementary, but I'm hearing that they are competing agendas. Could you reflect on that? Do you have any views?