Thank you. I am not a mathematical modeller. For the model methodology, there's a link on our website. It's from Simon Fraser University. The model is put through many different scenarios to give projections.
What I can provide, though, is more on the epidemiology front and what is being reported by local public health. There are a number of really key take-homes.
One is that even at the national level we can see that at least 30%, and in some cases more, of the cases are unlinked, which means they are community transmissions that haven't linked back to a particular site. That's very concerning, because that trace-back mechanism is really important.
For the rest, the long-term care facility outbreaks are currently escalating, so we have to do more on that front.
There are school outbreaks, quite a number of them, but many of them are in small numbers and based on community transmission, not necessarily in-school transmission, so they need to be handled differently as well.
There are a number of quite large outbreaks related to certain work settings. We've heard about the meat-packing area, where there are a lot of measures that have to be put in place in order to sustain that essential service; as well as some in the food and retail area.
The reporting is, in a way, biased towards long-term care and schools or workplaces where there's a defined population and you can find them. Where it's difficult is outside of that, where people are not linking back, so it's up to the local jurisdiction, which currently has to put in these restrictive measures because they have lost the ability to link.
However, a lot of it is also due to social situations and private gatherings, as I've mentioned, whether they be weddings and other celebrations, or funerals, unfortunately.