I guess my question is whether the purpose of the discussion that's envisioned by the motion would be to set additional meeting dates or whether it would be to talk about which witnesses would come to provide testimony. That's still unclear to me.
If I just had a better sense of what the decision points are that people want to arrive at, then I'd have a better sense of whether I can meaningfully contribute to those decisions in this moment, or whether we would need some time to consult with our critic, who's obviously not at the table today.