Mr. Chair, I have just a quick point of order, plus a point of clarification.
From your perspective—again, I'm new on the committee—you cut off my colleague at the beginning. You said the reason was that his time had to accurately reflect the witness's time. There have been times when I've been on a committee where people have interrupted and asked for a simple yes-or-no answer. They've gotten that, and they were able to move on.
I'm curious, and I imagine our whips will probably have this discussion, but before it gets to that point, could you clarify your ruling, so we have it at least on our side? If the situation comes up again, we'd at least know your perspective.